Or Help One Fainting Robin Unto His Nest Again or Cool One s Pain

This is given through vague ideas and interpretive concepts, however, that showcase almost a desperation in that Dickinson is willing to offer this "aid" in diverse ways.

Again, this could seem like a wonderful trait, but every bit she repeats her truthful rationale—that providing this "help" will keep her life from existence "in vain"—the reader tin note that her master reasoning for offer these moments of assistance is to better her own life. This turns the theme of 'If I tin finish ane middle from breaking' into a reflection of how desperately a person could want to impact the world—so much that it tin be the driving strength of their existence.

If I can terminate one centre from breaking Analysis

Lines 1-2

If I can stop one eye from breaking,

I shall not live in vain;

This proclamation, given in such a simple fashion in these 2 lines, is the core theme of the poem, that by existing in a way that "tin finish one heart from breaking," the narrator "shall not live in vain." The easy interpretation of this idea is that so long as the ability exists to "help" some other person, life tin can be something that is worth experiencing. Still, it is worth noting that Dickinson has not said that life would not be "in vain" and then long as she could "help" another for a first concept. Rather, she has stated the specific action of being able to "stop one heart from breaking."

This negates the prospect of her primary goal existence general "assist" as there are plenty of avenues that general "aid" could take. Instead, she is primarily focused on preventing emotional hurt for another that feels like "breaking." Fifty-fifty though other concepts are explored afterwards in 'If I tin can stop one heart from breaking' , this is the initial situation that she addresses, which makes it experience every bit though it comes with a vast amount of priority.

Worth noting as well is that Dickinson does non say which "heart" she wants to keep "from breaking." Essentially, there is no 1 person that she wishes to "help"—not even herself. She only wishes to assist a full general "i." At that place are no limits to this concept—not so much as a argument of species.

Furthermore, the use of "shall" in Line 2 is much more dramatic, like a Shakespearean tragedy, than "will" would take been, and it is much more concrete than the conditional, "would." There is little room to uncertainty the proclamation with such a stiff, dramatic option, and that unmarried discussion in these two lines speaks to the strength of Dickinson's resolve on the matter. Basically, she truly believes that assisting another in this way leads to a life worth "liv[ing]."

Lines 3-7

If I can ease one life the aching,

Or absurd one hurting,

Or assist one fainting robin

Unto his nest again,

I shall not live in vain.

The notion that species is not addressed in regard to who Dickinson is willing to assistance is explored specifically in Lines 5 and half-dozen when she notes that if she could "help one fainting robin [u]nto his nest again, [she] shall non live in vain." This solidifies the theory that she does not care who or what she assists, only that this assistance will potentially make her life worth experiencing.

An interesting thing virtually this, however, is that she uses the word, "Unto," instead of what might exist the more typical, "into." As "[u]nto" can have a connotation of meaning "until," it does not necessarily fit with the notion of assisting a "robin" to "his nest." The "robin," after all, would go "in" its "nest," which would seemingly call for the word, "into." What this could hateful is that Dickinson is subtly letting the reader know that she does not hateful a literal "robin" or "nest" since the wording is merely shy of what would be proper to explain that scenario.

If such is the case, she is probable describing her fellow homo in this way, like a female parent bird catering to her offspring. There is tenderness and intendance in that scenario, something that expresses fondness and a lack of ability on the part of the children. By translation, then, the reader can infer that Dickinson would offer this assistance with the aforementioned tenderness toward those who truly demand information technology, like a baby bird would need an older one.

The question, at this point, becomes why Dickinson would bring up a "robin" to explain humanity in this way, given that a concept of humanity could have achieved the same goal. The reply could reside in the theory that by bringing up a "robin" that is beyond expectations of humanity—an animal that can soar and exist above our natural reach—Dickinson is letting the reader know that she is thinking on a grander calibration than just mutual concepts where this kind of "help" could come up into play. She is willing, by this estimation, to think outside of the box and to "help" in ways that are varied and deep.

This is noted, as well, in the vague ideas that she addresses for how she could help another, like "eas[ing]… agonized" or "cool[ing]… pain." There are so many ideas that could be nether these umbrellas—physical injure and all of its possibilities, as well every bit mental and emotional "pain"—and few to no specifics are given outside of the earlier mentioned notion of a "center" that "interruption[s]." This again reinforces how strongly Dickinson feels about mending that kind of "interruption" since it is the clearest human being problem she notes to "help," and it too sets up the reader to be able to soar into higher logic with the "robin" concept. There are few boundaries in "eas[ing]… aching" and "cool[ing]… hurting," so without those boundaries, the reader is ready to caput into the heaven with the "robin" to note that any interpretation of the "assist" is possible.

She ends 'If I can stop i middle from breaking' with the same declaration that she "shall not live in vain," which cements the theory that "assist[ing]" others can create a life that is worthwhile. It also, nonetheless, holds a hint of selfishness since her words of assistance toward others are grounded at 2 points in the selfish notion of how it will impact her life. Whether or not this is a deliberate activeness on the poet's function is open for debate, merely it does offering a dark area to what could accept otherwise been interpreted as an unselfish life. Dickinson may desire to "assistance," but the repeated rationale for this is that it will prevent her life from existence "in vain."

This speaks to how deeply people tin can want to change something in their existence. Information technology does not potentially affair what is existence fixed—"breaking," "eas[ing]," "absurd[ing]," or "help[ing]" humans or "robin[s]"—so long as something has been impacted in a meaningful way while a person "alive[s]." This takes the theme of the poem from a desire for a giving life to a pressing need for meaning in life that guides decisions and goals. By repeating this idea twice in 7 lines and decorating the imagery with linguistic communication that could accept many different applications, Dickinson drives this theme home with a vastness of possibilities and self-connected reasoning for the practise.

About Emily Dickinson

Born in 1830, Emily Dickinson is one of the most well-known American poets of all time. Her public fame, however, did not come up to its full height until later her death in 1886. In fact, it was later her passing that two collections of her work were published in 1890 and 1955.

zunigaoldisher.blogspot.com

Source: https://poemanalysis.com/emily-dickinson/if-i-can-stop-one-heart-from-breaking/

Share this post